tking
11th June 2008, 04:31 PM
The media has been all over Obama's being the "first African-American" Presidential nominee, but the fact of the matter is that he's bi-racial. And as this article (http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/06/09/btsc.obama.race/?iref=mpstoryview) points out, he fits into that category on the census. I may be being a bit picky, but it seems to me that this "first African-American" title is a half-truth. Obama has, himself, stated that he is born of a white mother and a black father and that's why he wants to bridge the racial issues. If that is so, why would he let the "first African-American" label continue to be the "fame" of his nomination?
I've been thinking about this for a while, and I guess it was an article I read yesterday about the word feud going on between Clint Eastwood and Spike Lee about Eastwood's movies about Iwo Jima and the raising of the American flag. Lee was all hot about the fact that Eastwood didn't have any black soldiers depicted in the events he made these movies about. Eastwood's response was that Lee needed to read history because the particular events he'd made movies (http://movies.msn.com/movies/article.aspx?news=317895) about didn't involve any black soldiers in the main theme of them. My first thought was...okay, so now we're expected to re-write history to make sure nothing is seen as racist? That brought me around to wondering a little more strongly about Obama's subtle deception.
I wouldn't vote for him anyway, but thinking about that made me wonder about the integrity of someone who blatantly uses a part of his race as a selling point. I wonder how his mom feels about that? And I wonder how Mr. Lee thinks on that issue...after all, even though Obama looks more black than white, there IS that white half of him. Kinda like there WERE black soldiers in WWII, but they weren't one of the men that raise the flag. Hmmmmm. Truth anyone?
Just thinking out loud here ;-).
I've been thinking about this for a while, and I guess it was an article I read yesterday about the word feud going on between Clint Eastwood and Spike Lee about Eastwood's movies about Iwo Jima and the raising of the American flag. Lee was all hot about the fact that Eastwood didn't have any black soldiers depicted in the events he made these movies about. Eastwood's response was that Lee needed to read history because the particular events he'd made movies (http://movies.msn.com/movies/article.aspx?news=317895) about didn't involve any black soldiers in the main theme of them. My first thought was...okay, so now we're expected to re-write history to make sure nothing is seen as racist? That brought me around to wondering a little more strongly about Obama's subtle deception.
I wouldn't vote for him anyway, but thinking about that made me wonder about the integrity of someone who blatantly uses a part of his race as a selling point. I wonder how his mom feels about that? And I wonder how Mr. Lee thinks on that issue...after all, even though Obama looks more black than white, there IS that white half of him. Kinda like there WERE black soldiers in WWII, but they weren't one of the men that raise the flag. Hmmmmm. Truth anyone?
Just thinking out loud here ;-).